Saturday, April 18, 2020

Samurai Jack and Dialogue

‘Sup peeps. Both Uncharted and Journey are free on the PlayStation store, which is cool I guess. I’ve mentioned watching Samurai Jack, I think, but lately I’ve been getting really into Community too, and I’m thinking of rewatching the first season of The Clone Wars since I have those DVDs (got them from Blockbuster when they went under years ago!).

I was considering doing another Rick Riordan Note, but I think I’m going to try making that for ImpishIdea? Something about responding to fan criticism, or Percy’s fatal flaw, or something like that.

Now, let’s talk about Samurai Jack!

[Also a lot of what I’m talking about here applies to the original Star Wars: Clone Wars 2D animated series too, because it’s also created by the same animator, Genndy Tartakovsky, and has a lot of stylistic similarities.]

--- 

Samurai Jack and Dialogue

Since I’m going about two episodes a day with this show, I’ve been thinking about it a lot. One of the things that sticks out pretty early on is how light on dialogue several episodes are. There aren’t any with no dialogue, at least that I can think of off the top of my head. But there are many that don’t have that much.

So the story of Samurai Jack goes something like this: an ancient evil being called Aku threatens imperial Japan. The Emperor’s son, our titular samurai, manages to fight him using a magic sword, but before he can fully defeat Aku, the monster chucks him in a time portal and he lands in the far future. The samurai finds himself in a futuristic world with robots, aliens and mutants alongside magic and swords, and it’s all ruled by Aku. So he’s trying to go back to the past so that he can stop this dystopia before it happens, helping random people being oppressed by Aku’s reign as he does so.

In the first four seasons, while there are some episodes that lead into each other, for the most part, each episode is something of a standalone adventure. Aside from flashbacks and such, there are very few recurring characters--the only human that shows up between seasons often is the Scotsman. A couple of the gods appear in more than one episode, but it isn’t like they have direct interactions with Jack.

And from the introductory movie (or three-part episode, depending on what format you watch it in), the series has huge chunks of story that don’t have dialogue. Jack’s training montage, for instance, shows him going around the world and learning different skillz. There’s not a word of dialogue from when little Jack leaves Japan until he gets back as an adult, where he happens upon one of Aku’s minions whipping his father.

This made me think about dialogue, and how much dialogue gets put into screen stories these days, especially in bits that don’t really need them? Samurai Jack has fight scenes in which there’s not a word spoken, unless it’s with someone like Aku who just never shuts up. It’s in-character, so it makes sense. But considering that he’s fighting robots and monsters for most of the series, of course there isn’t a lot of dialogue in those sequences.

But there are other sequences that don’t have dialogue, nor is there much reason for it. “The Blind Archers,” aside from the bit that he’s being shot at, has an extended sequence where after Jack blindfolds himself, takes in his surroundings by listening to what’s going on around him, and showing us what he hears as he hears it. After a brief word to explain what he’s doing, there’s not another word in the episode until he defeats the archers.

Then there’s the episode showing the origins of Aku, and a huge chunk of the first part doesn’t have dialogue at all; it just shows you what happened. And considering that it starts before human history began, of course it can’t have that much dialogue.

Yes, there are episodes that have a huge chunk of dialogue. But so much of the actual action takes place without it. It sounds dumb when I put it like that; of course there’s not a lot of conversation going on during a fight. But sit and think about the animated shows that you watched as a kid. How many of them have absolutely no dialogue during the fight scenes. Usually there are quips, or explanations of what someone’s doing, or side characters watching saying something.

There’s so little of that in Samurai Jack. And there are non-action scenes that tell you so much without saying a word, and it’s beautiful.

Now I’m thinking of Samurai Jack as the polar opposite of the 90’s Spider-Man: The Animated Series. Have you ever watched it? There are rarely a few seconds that aren’t spent by someone (usually Peter) talking. 

Film and television are visual mediums. That’s something that sounds obvious, but you’d be surprised how often it’s forgotten. Yes, there are times where you need dialogue, and I’m not saying that every story can be composed the same way that Samurai Jack is; and it doesn’t need to be. But it’s a good reminder of how much story you can tell without having to directly say anything. You can great stories with sound and sights alone. The audience can pick up quite a lot by what you show them.

You don’t need for Jack to tell the audience that he’s pissed; you can convey it through his frustrated expression, and how he fights with much more aggression and starts screaming in incoherent rage. You don’t need to tell us that the archers are blind; you can just show us how Jack discovers they are, when he waves his hat out as a target and they don’t shoot at anything until they hear a noise. You don’t need to have Jack wail and moan about how much he misses home; you see it as he wanders around the ruins and has wordless recollections about growing up there in its glory days.

This works well by virtue of the story’s format, I know; some of this wouldn’t work as well if you’re juggling several main characters, and want to give all of them some development. But because this show only has the one lead, and it’s not too worried about inter-episode continuity, it can afford to not rely heavily on dialogue and still tell powerful stories that carry the series. And it works extremely well because of it.

Samurai Jack is one of the best animated series I’ve ever seen (at least, so far; I haven’t gotten to the final revival finale season, so who knows?). It’s easily the one that takes advantage of the medium it’s in the most--by showing instead of telling, as a good animated series should.

---

Saturday, April 4, 2020

Harry, A History and Fandom

I am watching… a LOT, actually. Just finished season six of Buffy, and I’m almost done with Locke & Key and the second season of The Expanse. And I’m streaming Samurai Jack because that’s free right now and that show is awesome.

Anyhow I reread this book by the webmistress of the HP fansite, The Leaky Cauldron. This Note’s going up on the Blogger site and also on a photo on my Facebook, to see if I’ll continue this book thing.

---

Harry, A History and Fandom

Harry, A History by Melissa Anelli is a sort-of memoir that details one Harry Potter fan’s journey through the HP fandom and its various movements and drama. And I remember when I first read it, I really liked the book. And upon rereading, I still really like it. But I feel different about it, and it seems as if I picked up an artifact of a different age. Fandom culture has changed so much since this book’s release in 2008.

In a way, it’s a bit like reading Ready Player One except without as much of the cringe in the dark turns gamer culture took. That makes this book sound bad, so I’ll try to explain with more detail.

When I was reading reviews of Harry, A History on Goodreads in preparation for this Note, I kept seeing a lot of the same idea repeated by many readers: this claims to be a sort of biography of the Harry Potter phenomenon, but it’s not really reflective of the average fan’s experience. Anelli’s telling the story of someone who became a superfan; someone who had reading parties with her friends after waiting in line for the next book to come out; someone who went to conventions that hosted shipping debates; someone who went on tour with a band that based their entire image and musical career on the HP books. Yeah, maybe the average fan had some involvement with some of this, but not all of it by a long shot. And especially now over ten years after the release of Deathly Hallows, so much of this has become obscure fanlore.

The book spends quite some time detailing the formation and exploits of a band called Harry and the Potters, and all the spin-off bands that it spawned. But I had never heard of any of these bands before reading this book, and I don’t think most HP fans today have a passing familiarity with the bands at all.

There’s also quite a lot the book leaves out. Admittedly, there are some big fandom moments like A Very Potter Musical (which is FANTASTIC, by the way) which couldn’t make it because they weren’t released yet. But Potter Puppet Pals? That was a massive part of Internet culture, even outside of the hardcore Potter fandom, for years, and it’s not mentioned at all in this book. Things like college Quidditch teams, or unofficial guide books, or that weird Snape cult (YA RLY) never get mentioned. Sure, I don’t expect the book to cover every single aspect of the fandom ever, and maybe I’m only speaking from my experiences and I’m wrong, but I figured some of these were huge parts of the fandom and deserved at least a mention. Everyone I knew could quote “Mysterious Ticking Noise” and yet it’s not mentioned at all, but Harry and the Potters get a whole chapter?

I was also struck by the chapter on shipping, appropriately titled “The High Seas.” For those not in the know, “shipping” generally refers to fan preferences in relationships. So for the HP fandom, the big Ship War (which to my frustration, some people still argue about) is between Harry/Hermione and Ron/Hermione. And people care a lot about this; there were debates at conventions. When Half-Blood Prince came out and made it pretty obvious where this series was going, people received death threats and a man in his thirties wrote to Rowling about how disappointed he was that she wasn’t a better writer. A thing that certainly didn’t help was that the screenwriter for the films admitted to thinking Harry and Hermione should get together, which kind of shows in the movies if you watch them.

What got to me most was that this book more or less presents the fandom of Harry Potter as one big happy family, aside from the shipping wars. And I’m glad that Anelli felt that way, that she was able to make lifelong friends and connections which have made life better for a lot of people. But fandom is hardly always so beneficent. Cassandra Clare, now famous for her Mortal Instruments series, got her start in the HP fandom as the author of the fandom-defining novel-length fanfiction series the Draco Trilogy (many bits of which she cannibalized and reused in her original fiction). And that fanfiction also got her into a messy plagiarism scandal that haunts her to this day, and a history of cyber-bullying to boot. And hey, let’s not downplay that there were fans who sent death threats to the author, other fans, and actors from the films over the romantic relationships of fictional characters.

I mean, heck, I learned through Wikipedia that the author herself was cyber-stalked by someone banned from the site.

It’s also a bit funny because the impression Anelli gives of Rowling is of a humble Everyday Jo who’s just glad that people gain enjoyment from her books. If people read deeper into her books, then alright. And that’s the way I tend to read Harry Potter. But over the past few years, it seems like Rowling bought into her own hype, and tries to paint the books as a woke political commentary which… doesn’t work if you do more than broad thematic ideas, because if we read Harry Potter as political tract, we’d have to say it’s calling almost all government corrupt and useless and asking us to arm our children with weapons the government is trying to regulate. And that’s without getting into House Elves. Or goblins. I suspect none of that is the message Rowling was trying to convey, and that she was writing something of a modern fairy tale fantasy, but she won’t say that now, she’ll act as if somehow Voldemort represents Donald Trump or something.

So it’s a little uncomfortable reading this image of Rowling as a humble but brilliant author that is seemingly surprised by her own cultural importance because these days it feels as if she’s embraced that cultural importance, perhaps a bit too much. 

Still, it’s a very good book; Anelli puts much more detail than I would in covering several fan movements, and you do feel a sort of palpable excitement when she recounts her own anxiety and anticipation for the books as they’re coming out. It feels a bit like a time capsule from the early 2000’s, or a slice of the past that I’d almost forgotten. Maybe it’s because I’ve become a bitter and cynical raisin of an individual, but I don’t feel that sort of excitement for movies or books anymore.

And while I am miffed about a lot of what’s left out, I’m amazed at the level of detail of most of what’s in the book. There’s an entire chapter about an interview Anelli did with Laura Malory, the soccer mom from Georgia who famously tried to get the Harry Potter books banned from schools and one of the leaders of the Christian movements against the series. And Anelli doesn’t seem to like her, but she portrays this woman a lot more sympathetically than I would have expected; certainly more than most of the fandom would. There are sections about how the books got published in the first place, how seriously the spoilers for the final book were guarded, how Warner Brothers reacted to all the fan content being produced, and just how big this freaking series got. This was worldwide news, guys.

Maybe Harry, A History isn’t completely reflective of everyone’s experiences, and maybe it leaves out quite a lot. But it’s a celebration of a book series and a fandom that brought people together, and I can’t exactly fault it for that.

---

Saturday, March 28, 2020

On "All a Dream" BS

Good morning. I’m here to tell you that I’m terrified. In other news, I didn’t sleep well Thursday night because I had a terrible dream (I woke up thinking that someone was screaming), but I’m hoping that it means I wake up to a more productive weekend? Maybe? Not sure how that would even work, but let’s stay optimistic, shall we?

Also I’m still open to suggestions for my ‘Stay At Home’ Masterpost so if you’ve got something you think people should check out.

This was originally going to be an essay about Corona-19, but I’m depressed enough as it is. In summary of the essay that would have been:

-This sux.
-I’m anxious.
-Don’t touch me.
-I’m allergic to pollen.
-Job market is garbage, thanks for asking.
-I’m tired of apocalyptic events.

Anyhow!

---

“All a Dream” BS

So in case you don’t know, I’ve been watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer since college because I’d never seen it before and I thought it was one of the most influential television shows ever made. I made a Tumblr blog for it (yetanotherbuffyblog, if you’re interested), though it’s not being updated right now because I’m off of Tumblr for Lent. And I’ll admit that watching has been slow, in part because I wasn’t very motivated, and then it got taken down from Netflix, and then I moved away from the library I used to get the DVD’s from.

But now it legally streams for free on Facebook so I started making an effort to keep going. And I’m currently on the tail end of Season Six.

There’s an episode towards the end of the sixth season in which, through [waves hands] magic shenanigans, Buffy is getting flashes of another life, in which it seems like she’s actually in a mental asylum and that all of her adventures as we’d seen them throughout the entire series, are actually a massive web of hallucinations that she’d built up. Obviously, she chooses to go forward with her life as the Slayer, because there’s another season and several sequel comics, but the episode actually leaves it ambiguous as to whether or not the other world was real.

Whedon himself refuses to give an answer to the audience, though one of the show’s producers (who didn’t write this episode, it should be noted) claims that of course it’s fake, because this show is all about female empowerment and the idea that this is all in Buffy’s head detracts from that theme. 

Talking with my Whedon Consultant, we discussed our thoughts on this episode. He believed that it was way too late in the show’s run to pull the rug out from under us and make us seriously think that this was all a hallucination. I agreed, but I also thought that it was a really weird idea for a hallucination: in part because Buffy’s underlying character has always just wanted to be a normal person, not the Slayer, but mainly because most of the characters and events in her life had no counterparts in the asylum. All her friends, all her fights, all the drama, all the walking around--it’s apparently just something she dreamed up while being confined to a padded room? That doesn’t make that much sense to me? It’s not that she’s imagining her life is actually this big adventure, it’s that apparently it’s all a dream.

And okay, let me get to the point I set out to make: the whole idea of ending the story with a “It’s all a dream!” scenario is almost always an incredibly lazy cop-out. You shouldn’t use it.

Admittedly, I tend to be more lenient on examples where it isn’t clear whether or not it is a dream. The Buffy is egregious because we’re already five or six years into the show’s run, so handwaving it as a dream is… well, if it is a dream, we’d hardly care that much because we’re already invested in the story and characters. But in examples like El laberinto del fauno (YES I used the Spanish title for Pan’s Labyrinth, get over it) the movie doesn’t tell you it’s all in this little girl’s imagination: it’s up to you to interpret whether you think it is or not.

And if it happens partway through a story, that’s okay too! There’s a brilliant episode of Person of Interest that, partway through the episode, reveals that what we’ve seen is a simulation of what might happen being run by the Machine, who goes back and runs through it again. Or there’s the comic The Dreamer, in which Beatrice is going back and forth from life into the dreams where there are two continuous storylines: one in the modern day, the other in the American Revolution.

Then there’s that interesting episode of Batman: The Animated Series in which Bruce gets the life he’s always wanted, but it turns out to be a dream made by Mad Hatter. But in that case, we know from watching the episode that there’s something not quite right throughout the story, that something is off and we’re trying to figure out what it is. In that case, it makes sense that it’s a dream because it fits with the information we’ve already been presented.

But if at the end of a story, for the author to say, “Welp, actually none of it was real! It was a dream! Or a hallucination!” as a cheap twist ending, it devalues the story. The author didn’t commit to the story he or she was telling. It’s a trick to say, “All of that? Well it didn’t actually matter!” And it’s a bit difficult to not feel ripped off when the author is straight-up telling you that everything you cared about didn’t happen and didn’t matter.

This is, in large part, why I’m against the theory of Assassin’s Creed fans that everything that happened in-series was actually a simulation? The main story now seems to be leaning that direction, which I’m not a huge fan of, though I don’t quite know where they’re going with it, as the characters themselves seem to be becoming aware of it and that’s a whole ‘nother creature altogether.

[I’ve also seen this used as a sort of retcon; for instance, the much derided Highlander: The Source was declared by one of the actors as just a bad dream, which, okay fair, that movie sucked. But there’s also a line in one of the straight-to-home video American Tail movies that retcons the second one into just being a dream, and that earns a slap to whoever wrote that line. I’m not a huge fan of it as a retconning device, unless it’s to erase something absolutely terrible from the continuity.]

The story should make you feel satisfied at the end. I shouldn’t reach the end of a story and say, “Wow, I got really worked up about absolutely nothing!” Which is ultimately what you’ve done if you go with this twist. If the ending of the story is telling me that I shouldn’t have gotten invested… well, that’s not a great thing to do if you want an audience to care about what you’ve written!

So don’t do it!

---

Saturday, March 21, 2020

Castlevania: Season 3 Review

I think I’m also going to do a masterpost of links to do if you’re stuck somewhere and you’re really bored.

This review has spoilers, yo.

---

Castlevania: Season 3 Review

If you’ve read my previous reviews, you know I have a bit of a rocky history with the Netflix adaptation of Castlevania. I love the animation and the action, and I like the core team of characters quite a bit. But thematically I have some issues with its overall message: on religion (which it doesn’t seem to like very much), on human nature (which it seems to like even less), and on its pacing. That last one stood out, because the first season is only four episodes and its second season is eight, and in  all of that we get both our setup and our climax, and I thought it didn’t feel that earned, especially since the heroes spent most of season two sitting in a basement doing homework. Them killing Dracula was awesome, but I didn’t get a sense that it was all building up to this moment, you know?

Season three is a bit better on its pacing, though the way that works might frustrate viewers to an extent. Because while it feels like this season gives the characters some stuff to do that isn’t rushing towards a climactic battle, at the same time… very little actual Plot development happens. Trevor and Sypha’s story doesn’t connect with anything else in a direct way, nor does Alucard’s. Isaac’s story is good overall, but the season ends before it really gets going. And Hector’s just… goes exactly where you expected from the very beginning.

And since I mentioned Hector, I’ll go into my number one problem for the season: the Plot relies on people being stupid. Hector’s in particular sticks out. After trusting Carmilla last season backfired (because OF COURSE IT DID), it seems like maybe Hector has learned his lesson, as first chance he gets he tries to hold Lenore, one of vampires on Carmilla’s council, hostage. Except after she beats the snot out of him, she keeps trying to be nice to him by talking how vampires aren’t so bad, feeding him food, getting him better living arrangements, and so on. But whenever she takes him for a walk she puts him on a leash, and when he does something she wants she tells him “Good boy!” like a dog. So at the end of the season she seduces him, and during sex gets him to swear loyalty to her, which because of black magic shenanigans binds him to her and means that he physically can’t escape. And then he’s like, “You tricked me!”

YES! The vampire woman who treats you like a pet sees you as a pet! Why would you think otherwise? Why would you have sex with her? Why would you swear loyalty while having sex with her? All of those are things that would happen only if Hector was a complete moron. Which apparently, he is.

That’s hardly the only example this season of someone being stupid, but it’s the one that sticks out. There’s also the Lindenfeld Plot, in which the deranged evil monks who worship Dracula are carving alchemical symbols on all the houses in town, but no one sees fit to try to scratch out or get rid of these marks. There’s the two Japanese vampire slayers who go to Alucard to train, only to decide that he needs to die for… Reasons? 

Leading to my next point: if the first two seasons had a low opinion of humanity, it’s even lower here. Yeah, there’s the stupidity, but the implication is that humans are just stupid to begin with, and of the few that aren’t, most of them are terrible. The finale reveals that the Judge who’d been aiding Trevor and Sypha all season, seeming to be a reasonable authority figure, was also a child serial killer, something that doesn’t affect the Plot at all except to kick you while you’re down. Isaac has a conversation with a damned soul which tells us that apparently in the Castlevania-verse, when Greece turned Christian that pagan philosophers were hunted through the streets like animals and tortured. That thinking about God was considered a crime to get you executed.

[Thomas Aquinas would like to disagree.]

I’m also really not comfortable with the show apparently hardlining this anti-Christian stance, considering we live in a world which there are violent groups of people who increasingly want us Christians dead that there’s a critically acclaimed series more or less declaring that it’s totally fine, Christians are monsters anyway so they all deserve to die. I recognize that the places where this is a big issue are generally not where this show is streamed, but it’s still a very disconcerting notion that it consistently tries to paint an entire religion as by its very nature evil.

TV Tropes’s YMMV pages tells me that I should be grateful for that one priest character who blesses some water in Season One, but let’s be real: he isn’t given a name, never shows up before or after that point, and has no lines at all. 

And while Plot’s pacing is much better, the pacing of characterization isn’t. There’s some ship tease between Trevor and Sypha in the first two seasons, but when we start Season Three they’re already in a sexual relationship, which is more than a little jarring considering we haven’t even seen them kiss before this point. It’s not just me, is it? That we’re following two of our leads, and the show’s like, “Oh, by the way, they’re sleeping together now. Is that cool?” It’s a huge bit of character development to just skip over.

Isaac’s character arc is a bit frustrating because he’s very slow to figure out why guards are upset at him marching a group of Hellspawn through their towns. There’s also a notable scene where someone tells him, “What if humans aren’t all bad and don’t all deserve to die?” and that gives Isaac some pause. Which is stupid, because you’re telling me he’s gone all this time hating humanity and wiping them out, and never once did he stop and think, “Hey maybe not all humans are terrible to everyone else all the time!”? This stoic character has never stopped and thought about what he’s doing?

Hector’s just an idiot and that’s irritating to watch.

And Alucard has Sumi and Taka to train, who then decide because he isn’t helping them as much as they want that they’ve got to seduce him into a threesome (???) and then murder him (?!?). This isn’t actually out of nowhere, as we see them talk to each other and Alucard about how he’s not sharing everything with them, and how they really want to figure out to make the castle move and he’s telling them that the mechanism is broken and he doesn’t have much interest in fixing it. But them leaping from that to seduction and murder is a leap I didn’t quite follow.

It felt many times that the series was trying very hard to be bleak and grimdark, and of course, this is Castlevania, of course it’s got to be dark. But so much of it was just pointlessly so. This wasn’t monsters killing people, this was people being dicks to each other for no discernible reason. One of the characters was an actual child serial killer, and this wasn’t a part of the story for anything except shock value. 

This season was not without its bright points; the Plot moves along much better. There are interesting new characters, like Carmilla’s council and the Count of Saint Germaine. And the action’s top notch again; the battle at the end of the season is well worth the wait. But I don’t know if it was worth the full ending, and some of the other bits of the season. I can’t help but find myself thinking that if the show is going to continue with giving us a grimdark atmosphere with plot twists like this, I can’t say I’m interested. 

I don’t care for it.

---

Stuck At Home Masterpost

If you’re stuck at home and you’re really bored, some links to look into that might cheer you up:



I'll probably expand this list as time goes on! Suggestions are welcome!